Constitutional and Legislative Affairs Committee

 

 

 

Spring 2013 subsidiarity monitoring report (January – April 2013)

 

Date of paper:

June 2013

 


This briefing has been produced by the Research Service for use by the Constitutional and Legislative Affairs Committee.

For further information, contact Owain Roberts in the Research Service
Telephone ext. 8584
Email: (
owain.roberts@wales.gov.uk)



 

 


 

Contents

1.          Introduction. 3

2.          The monitoring process. 4

3.          Overview of draft EU legislative proposals received (January – April 2013) 5

3.1.      EU legislative proposals identified as raising subsidiarity concerns. 5

3.2.      EU legislative proposals that were subject to correspondence. 6

3.3.      EU legislative proposals that did not raise any subsidiarity concerns. 8

 

 

 



1.         Introduction

Under Standing Order 21, a ‘responsible committee’ in the Assembly (currently the Constitutional and Legislative Affairs Committee) is empowered to consider draft EU legislation that relates to matters within the legislative competence of the Assembly or to the functions of the Welsh Ministers and of the Counsel General, to identify whether it complies with the principle of subsidiarity.

The principle of subsidiarity is enshrined in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union:

1. The limits of Union competences are governed by the principle of conferral. The use of Union competences is governed by the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality.

2. Under the principle of conferral, the Union shall act only within the limits of the competences conferred upon it by the Member States in the Treaties to attain the objectives set out therein. Competences not conferred upon the Union in the Treaties remain with the Member States.

3. Under the principle of subsidiarity, in areas which do not fall within its exclusive competence, the Union shall act only if and in so far as the objectives of the proposed action cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, either at central level or at regional and local level, but can rather, by reason of the scale or effects of the proposed action, be better achieved at Union level.

The institutions of the Union shall apply the principle of subsidiarity as laid down in the Protocol on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality. National Parliaments ensure compliance with the principle of subsidiarity in accordance with the procedure set out in that Protocol.

4. Under the principle of proportionality, the content and form of Union action shall not exceed what is necessary to achieve the objectives of the Treaties.

The institutions of the Union shall apply the principle of proportionality as laid down in the Protocol on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality.[1]

In addition, the application of the principle is governed by the Protocol on the Application of the Principles of Subsidiarity and Proportionality. The relevant part in relation to the work of the Assembly is included in the first paragraph of Article 6:

Any national Parliament or any chamber of a national Parliament may, within eight weeks from the date of transmission of a draft legislative act, in the official languages of the Union, send to the Presidents of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission a reasoned opinion stating why it considers that the draft in question does not comply with the principle of subsidiarity. It will be for each national Parliament or each chamber of a national Parliament to consult, where appropriate, regional parliaments with legislative powers. [RS emphasis][2]

 

2.         The monitoring process

In order to ensure that the Constitutional and Legislative Affairs Committee fulfils its subsidiarity monitoring function effectively as set out in Standing Orders, Assembly officials monitor all draft EU legislative proposals that apply to Wales on a systematic basis to check whether they raise any subsidiarity concerns. The way in which Assembly officials monitor these proposals is outlined below for information:

¡  The Assembly in the first instance is notified of all proposals published by the European Commission for consideration through a list (known as the “batch list”) which is sent by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office on behalf of the UK Government to the Assembly’s Research Service for information.

¡  The relevant UK Government department will then prepare an Explanatory Memorandum (EM) based on the proposals included on the batch list usually within 4 to 6 weeks of the initial notification by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Each EM includes an assessment of the policy impact of the proposals (including whether the UK Government department believes the proposal raises any subsidiarity concerns). Copies of each EM are sent to the Assembly via the Research Service.

¡  The Research Service filters the EMs received to check whether the proposal they relate to are ‘legislative’ or ‘non-legislative’[3] and whether they encompass issues which may be of interest to the Assembly (i.e. relating to devolved matters).

¡  Those EMs that relate to proposals that are both ‘legislative’ and deal with issues of interest to the Assembly are then checked further by officials from the Assembly’s Legal Services, Brussels Office and the Research Service to see whether they raise any potential subsidiarity concerns.

¡  If a proposal raises subsidiarity concerns, Assembly officials will alert the Constitutional and Legislative Affairs Committee immediately whereupon Members will be asked to consider whether the Committee should ask either or both Houses at Westminster to issue a ‘reasoned opinion’ on the proposal or not.

¡  Those proposals which are ‘legislative’ and relate to devolved matters but raise no subsidiarity concerns are then collated in a monitoring report produced by the Research Service which is considered as a paper to note by the Constitutional and Legislative Affairs Committee during each term in an Assembly year (Autumn [September-December], Spring [January-April] and Summer [May – August]).

This report therefore includes a general overview of those draft EU legislative proposals received by the Assembly’s Research Service between January and April 2013, and provides further information about those proposals that were identified by Assembly officials as being both ‘legislative’ in nature and relating to devolved matters.

Please note however that this report only monitors ‘legislative’ proposals, it does not contain details of any ‘non-legislative proposals’ that may be relevant to the work of the Assembly. These are monitored on a separate basis by the Research Service.

3.         Overview of draft EU legislative proposals received (January – April 2013)

A total of 271 UK Government EMs relating to EU proposals were received by the Assembly’s Research Service from the UK Government between 1 January 2013 and 30 April 2013. Of these, 17 EMs were identified by Assembly officials as being both ‘legislative’ in nature and of interest to the Assembly. Following further analysis by officials from the Assembly’s Legal Service, Brussels Office and Research Service, these were subsequently filtered as follows:

¡  1 proposal was identified as raising subsidiarity concerns and was the subject of a ‘written representation’ by the Constitutional and Legislative Affairs Committee to the European Scrutiny Committee in the House of Commons and the EU Select Committee in the House of Lords.

¡  2 proposals were the subject of correspondence between the Constitutional and Legislative Affairs Committee and the the European Scrutiny Committee in the House of Commons and the EU Select Committee in the House of Lords, on the basis that they have a particular impact on devolved matters in Wales.

¡  14 proposals did not raise any subsidiarity concerns.

Additional details about these filtered proposals are included below.

3.1.         EU legislative proposals identified as raising subsidiarity concerns

Date EM received

Title, description and timeline

24 April 2013

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on measures to reduce the cost of deploying high-speed electronic communications networks (COM(2013)147).

The proposed regulation contains eleven articles which are aimed at reducing the overall cost of deploying new superfast broadband infrastructure, primarily through measures intended to reduce the costs of civil engineering works during rollout. The key aims of the proposed regulation fall into four main areas: access to existing infrastructure; information provision around existing infrastructure; co-ordination of street works / permitting; and infrastructure in new buildings.

The proposed regulations support the the Digital Agenda for Europe and the European Commission’s main broadband targets of achieving 30 Mbps broadband speeds for 100% of households, and at least 50% of these households subscribing to speeds over 100 Mbps, by 2020.

The proposal was discussed by the Committee on 13 May 2013. A written representation was subsequently sent from the Chair to the Lords EU Select Committee, the Commons’ European Scrutiny Committee, the four Welsh MEPs and the European Commission on 15 May 2013.

3.2.         EU legislative proposals that were subject to correspondence

Date EM received

Title, description and timeline

EM not received: copy obtained from the Department of Health’s website

Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the approximation of the laws, regulation and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and the sale of tobacco and related products (COM(2012)0788)

The proposal revises the current legal framework relating to the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products and sets out new and strengthened rules. The proposal in particular aims to extend the scope of the current Tobacco Products Directive to encompass non-tobacco nicotine-containing products (‘NCP’) (e.g. electronic-cigarettes) below a certain nicotine threshold.

At present, NCP products fall outside the scope of the Tobacco Products Directive, and Member States have taken different approaches to these products, including regulating them as medicinal products, applying certain provisions that are used for tobacco products, or having no specific legislation. The proposal aims as a result to remove the current legislative divergence between Member States.

The proposal was discussed by the Committee on 25 February 2013[4] and a Letter was subsequently sent by the Chair of the Committee to the Chairs of the Lords EU Select Committee and the Commons’ European Scrutiny Committee on 26 February 2013.

 

 

15 February 2013

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Deployment of Alternative Fuels Infrastructure (COM(2013)18).

The proposal sets out mandatory requirements for the build-up and coverage of alternative fuels infrastructure for transport, and common technical standards for their construction and interoperability. Four alternative fuels have been identified as having the potential to substantially reduce greenhouse gas emissions from transport (both road and maritime) and oil consumption, but these are currently held back by a lack of infrastructure across the EU.

The proposal in particular would require Member States to adopt and publish national policy frameworks, which the Commission intends to review for coherence at an EU level and report its findings to the European Parliament.

The proposal was discussed by the Committee on 18 March 2013[5] and a letter was subsequently sent by the Chair of the Committee to the four Welsh MEPs, and the Chairs of the Lords EU Select Committee and the Commons’ European Scrutiny Committee on 20 March 2013.


 

3.3.         EU legislative proposals that did not raise any subsidiarity concerns

Date EM received

Title and description

6 February 2013

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the accessibility of public sector